Make your own free website on Tripod.com
Blog Tools
Edit your Blog
Build a Blog
RSS Feed
View Profile
« May 2012 »
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
You are not logged in. Log in
Entries by Topic
All topics  «
The Right Right
Wednesday, 3 October 2007
Pressing Presidential Issues

     While I am of the belief that presidential primaries occur much too early, and that we should be focused on other issues more pressing than an election that is more than a year away, I am sensing a disturbing shake up in the Republican party in 2008. 

     The modern day GOP is made up of a very uneasy coalition of conservative Christians and limited government fiscal conservatives.  The contrast in the two groups beliefs is becoming more and more evident with every passing day, and it looks like it may really come to a head in the '08 presidential election.  Conservative Christians are now threatening that if the GOP nominates a candidate that does not support their policies wholeheartedly, they will form a third-party and present their own candidate.  Specifically, as Rudy Giuliani continues to climb in the polls, this groups of social conservatives can only focus on his pro-abortion stance.  

     To say that abortion is a contentious issue is like saying the grass is green, and I have personal reservations about the former New York politician's beliefs as well.  However, history has shown that this fragmentation of our party would lead to disaster.  Let us go back to the election of 1912.  Teddy Roosevelt, who had elected not to run for a second full term in 1908 because of his inheriting the presidency from the assassinated William McKinley, decided to run again in 1912 because of his dissatisfaction with William Howard Taft.  He created the Bull Moose Party, and fragmented the Republican party, so even though the two Republican candidates won 7.6 million votes, Woodrow Wilson won the election with 6.3 million votes and 435 electoral votes.  The result would be very similar if the conservative Christians try to fragment the Republican party today.  The difference: it would not be the great statesman Woodrow Wilson assuming the presidency, but perhaps the much more scary prospect of Hillary Clinton.  Nobody wants that.

     While I appreciate the gravity of many of these very difficult issues, there is much more to politics than feelings on social issues such as abortion.  Republicans have to get back to focusing on government and trying to solve our domestic and foreign problems.  If we allow social issues to split all of us with similar beliefs, we will wind up with four years in which ALL Republicans will be unhappy.  Call it politics, call it unfair, call it the system: it doesn't matter.  It's the truth. 


Posted by mvest20 at 10:08 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink
Thursday, 20 September 2007
I'm not sure about this, but I'm gonna give it a shot

     Well, I don't know how this will turn out, but I'm willing to give it a shot.

     First, for a little information about me, I am a 21-year-old college student that loves this country and all it stands for.  I am also a conservative, some would say very strong, but I am open to intelligent, productive, non-demeaning debate.  I will potentially be going to law school within the next year.  Therefore, many of my blogs will have to deal with issues that I encounter in my study of case law.  They will contain mostly political issues, unless I am particularly irritated on a particular day with a particular person/group/activist/sect/nation/etc.  

     This first topic is one of the most polarizing, politically instable issues that faces the country today.  Abortion.  Have you read Roe v. Wade?  I have.  In this 'landmark' case, the Supreme Court establishes an arbitrary, sliding scale that allows for abortion in the first trimester at any point, and only gives the States the right to regulate abortion once the fetus is 'viable.'  My problem is this: tell me when a fetus becomes viable, and then prove it.  Give me a definite point at which you can declare that a fetus can live outside of its mother's womb, and prove it, and I'll consider agreeing with the contention.  Until then, I cannot support such an arbitrary view of such an important issue.

     There is another very important issue that comes from this case: judicial activism.  The conclusion of this case reads a lot like a law being put into practice.  The problem is that it is not the Court's job to make these laws.  That is the job of Congress, and the legislative branch of Government.  The Court's job is to review laws and determine whether or not they are Constitutional, not to enact legislation from the bench.  The justices grossly overstepped their bounds here, and it worries me for future instances.

     I could talk about the issues in Roe v. Wade for hours, but unfortunately, I am on a limited schedule with school.  These two issues are the main ones that I can see, and if there are more, please do not hesitate to point them out to me. 


Posted by mvest20 at 11:19 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, 20 September 2007 11:40 AM EDT
Post Comment | Permalink

Newer | Latest | Older